Remove Accreditation Remove Audit Remove Cybersecurity Remove Technology
article thumbnail

Microsoft misfire: what can be learnt from the tech giant’s cybersecurity failings

SRM

Earlier this month, a federal cybersecurity watchdog group reported that Microsoft’s cloud cybersecurity has colossal and far-spanning shortcomings, including failed technology and an “inadequate” security culture that “requires an overhaul.” Naturally, customers are worried about what this could mean for their data.

article thumbnail

ISO 27001 Certification Requirements & Standards

Reciprocity

If using an ISO audit software tool to achieve ISO certification is on your compliance roadmap, here’s a quick primer to get you up to speed and jumpstart your ISO compliance efforts. The ISMS provides tools for management to make decisions, exercise control, and audit the effectiveness of InfoSec efforts within the company.

Audit 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Added Value of Security Data for Proptech

Security Industry Association

Is this transparent to the wider business and in particular cybersecurity teams? How are we currently tracking all our network-connected assets, managing product life cycle and assigning accountability for management and maintenance of these devices?

article thumbnail

SOC 2 vs ISO 27001: Key Differences Between the Standards

Reciprocity

An organization’s ISMS should encompass data, technology , cybersecurity, and employee behavior. These ideas include internal audits, continual monitoring, and corrective or preventive measures. Management must provide documentation proving the effectiveness of controls throughout the audit period. What Is an ISMS?

Audit 52
article thumbnail

IRM, ERM, and GRC: Is There a Difference?

Reciprocity

“The first was a technology vendor briefing demonstrating their solution to manage and integrate policies, controls, and risks. 2007-2012): Audit management, enterprise, and operational risk management, compliance beyond financial controls, and more. This struck me. Rasmussen sees the GRC development timeline as follows: GRC 1.0